Anak Hatta Rajasa Dituntut Hukuman 8 Bulan Penjara
Son of Hatta Rajasa Sentenced to 8 Months Jail
Reporter : Rusdi Kamal
Editor : Heru S Winarno
Translator : Novita Cahyadi
 b.jpg)
Jakarta (B2B) - Terdakwa kasus kecelakaan di tol Jagorawi, Rasyid Amrullah Rajasa dituntut hukuman delapan bulan penjara dengan masa percobaan selama 12 bulan penjara.
Putra Menko Perekonomian Hatta Rajasa itu dinilai terbukti telah melanggar pasal 310 (4) dan ayat (2) Undang-Undang Lalu Lintas.
Jaksa Penuntut Umum (JPU) Tengku Rahman mengatakan tuntutan ringan tersebut berdasarkan pada keadaan sosiologis dan keadaan yuridis Rasyid. JPU juga menuntut Rasyid membayar denda senilai Rp12 juta subsider 6 bulan kurungan.
"Kondisi sosiologis itu misalnya adanya perdamaian antara terdakwa dengan keluarga korban, kemudian keluarga korban menganggap ini sebagai musibah," kata Tengku Rahman dalam sidang pembacaan tuntutan di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur, Kamis (7/3).
Sementara dari sisi yuridis, Tengku mengatakan tuntutan tersebut berdasarkan pada pendapat ahli pidana di persidangan.
"Yang perlu dibuktikan dalam kasus ini adalah kelalaian dalam berkendara yang tidak disadari sehingga dikenakan pidana yang ringan," lanjutnya.
Jakarta (B2B) - The defendant cases of accidents on the highway Jagorawi, Rasyid Amrullah Rajasa was sentenced to eight months in prison with probation for 12 months in prison.
Son of Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Hatta Rajasa was considered proven to have violated Article 310 (4) and paragraph (2) Traffic Act.
Public Prosecutor Tengku Rahman said, charges a lighter sentence was based on the circumstances sociological and juridical Rasyid. Prosecutors also demanded Rashid pay fines worth Rp12 million subsidiary of 6 months imprisonment.
"Sociological condition that such a reconciliation between the defendant with the victim´s family, then the families of the victims consider this as a disaster," said Tengku Rahman in the trial reading charges in East Jakarta District Court on Thursday (7/3).
In terms of jurisdiction, Tengku said the lawsuit is based on expert opinion in the criminal trial.
"It should be proved in this case is the failure to realize that driving is not a minor criminal charges," he continued.
